Disclaimer
Updated on 07/07/2009 because I found something much better, courtesy of Douglas Bastien, of the blog Government of Canada, 2.0.
This site is the personal website of the pseudonymous blogger, Jimmy Jazz. This site is not owned, operated, or affiliated with the Jimmy’s real-life employer. This blog serves to share my learning with others, disseminate my knowledge and communicate my experiences. This site entirely reflects my own personal opinion.
You are welcome and encouraged to participate in the discussion on this site. Comments are owned by the poster. I reserve the right to remove inflammatory, inappropriate or irrelevant comments. While my commenters may be experts in the field of public health preparedness or emergency management and response, I am not. Nothing I write about on this blog should be considered expert opinion or advice.
Unfortunately, anyone looking to see ‘inside information’ on the state of public health preparedness and crisis communications won’t find it here. This blog will comment only on publicly-available information.
Everything that I write here has been written and released under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States license. I try to supplement my work with images that hold the same license. If additional works are not CC-licensed, I’ll let you know.
To re-iterate: This blog is in no way endorsed or supported by the Jimmy’s real-life employer, nor do any of Jimmy’s posts endorse or support the actions of Jimmy’s employer.
As always, if you have any questions, comments or concerns, please email me.
This blog is in no way endorsed or supported by the Government of Canada.
Or rather, the Government of Canada is in no way endorsed, or supported by this blog.
Purpose
Unfortunately, anyone looking to seeing ‘inside information’ on the government and the inside track of Web 2.0 developments, won’t find it here. This blog will comment on publicly-available information. To keep a positive tone, I will try to comment on what government ought to do, instead of focusing on or merely pointing out what it is doing wrong, with a commitment to accuracy to best not contradict an official department position.
